Page 23 - 捷運技術 第60期
P. 23

Journal of Rapid Transit System and Technology No.60
 pp. 11-26, 2025   DOI 10.29670/JRTST.202510_(60).0002                                        13




 Received June 01, 2023, accepted August 01, 2023, date of publication October 31, 2025  壹、前言  Peter Calthorpe 於 90 年代提出。其
                                                           理念是在構建大眾捷運運輸系統時,

 Exploring the construction model   早期捷運路網規劃時,捷運車          規劃引導居住、工作、購物、休閒

 integrating MRT station entrances/  站及相關附屬設施主要由捷運局發       等都市機能與活動空間,並於大眾
                                                           運輸路線廊帶及站點周邊有秩序分
                 包興建並負責自辦監造,但自民國
 ventilation shafts with land‐  89 年大眾捷運系統土地開發辦法修          布,同時配合土地混合使用和人本

                 正發布施行後,開發用地內之捷運                           步行環境設計,以形塑高可居性、
 development (TOD): A case study of Wanda–  設施屬出入口、通風口或其他相關  可及性及有效率的都市發展型態與

 Zhonghe Line stations LG06, LG07, and LG08  附屬設施等,經主管機關核准得交  土地利用模式,藉以減少人們對於

                 由投資人興建。為落實環境永續及                           私人運具的依賴,提高土地開發及
 CHUNGCHI TSAI , CHUNAN CHEN , TANGYU SHIH , ZHENGHAO HUEI 4  大眾運輸導向發展(Transit-Oriented   公共設施配置之效益,提升大眾運
 3
 2
 1
 1  Chief Engineer Office, First District Project Office, Department of Rapid Transit Systems, Taipei   Development)之理念,捷運局於捷  輸服務效能,同時降低都市不當向
 City Government
 2  Eleventh civil Engineering Site Office, Second District Project Office, Department of Rapid   運興建階段不再只擔任監造單位角  外擴張的情形。
 Transit Systems, Taipei City Government  色,係以主管機關身分與投資人合
 3  Fifth civil Engineering Site Office, First District Project Office, Department of Rapid Transit   二、捷運設施與土開共構模式
 Systems, Taipei City Government  作開發用地興建捷運共構設施,達
 4  Ninth civil Engineering Site Office, First District Project Office, Department of Rapid Transit   目前萬大線捷運設施與土開共
 Systems, Taipei City Government  到有效利用土地資源,促進地區發          構興建模式主要分為兩種,第一為
 Corresponding Author: HAOHUEI ZHENG, E-mail: wz0817@gov.taipei  展。然而,儘管捷運與土開共構設
                                                           捷運局將捷運與土開共構設施交由
 ABSTRACT        施可交由捷運土建標施工廠商或投                           捷運土建標施工廠商施作,後續再
                 資人興建,卻無一套準則可供依循,
 This article conducts an in-depth study on the co-construction models of MRT   究竟兩種模式的優缺點為何,不同  甄選投資人興建地上土開大樓;第
 station entrances/exits and ventilation shafts with over-station development (OSD)   二為捷運局再依工程現況甄選投資
 buildings. Currently, there are two primary construction models: construction by   背景及環境條件下如何選用合適的
 the MRT civil works contractor or development by a selected private investor.  興建方式?希望藉由本文案例檢討  人委建捷運土建設施,待相關結構
 To ensure the research reflects real-world scenarios, this study takes ongoing   主體完成後移交回捷運廠商辦理後
 construction sites along the Wanda Line—LG06 Station (MRT Contract 2), LG07   提供讀者參考。
 Station (MRT Contracts 3 and 4), and LG08 Station (MRT Contract 6)—as case   續裝修、水環及機電作業。
 studies. From the perspective of the construction phase, it analyzes and compares   此外,根據土開大樓與捷運設
 the impact of the two co-construction models on MRT project progress, costs,   貳、文獻回顧
 construction interfaces, and development benefits.        施興建方式可分為「共構」與「分
 The study summarizes the advantages, disadvantages, and applicable circumstances   構」,第一種「共構」是將土開大
 for each model. It is hoped that the conclusions drawn can serve as valuable   一、TOD 概念  樓直接興建於捷運出入口或是地下
 feedback for the planning and design stages, helping determine the most effective
 co-construction model for MRT-related developments under varying conditions.  TOD 全名是「Transit-Oriented   基礎之上,整體視為一個建物,此
                 Development」,由美國都市計畫師                     種構築方式土開大樓與捷運出入口
 Keywords:  Wanda Line, MRT joint development, integrated construction
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28